Skip to main content
Log In
☰
Community Reporter Network
User account menu
About Us
Events
Log in
Facebook
Youtube
Main navigation
Home
Explore
Projects
Reporters
Report transcript in: Ujima Radio Part 2
Breadcrumb
Home
Ujima Radio Part 2
Please Report the Errrors?
Good afternoon.
Thank you so much for uh sparing some time for me.
Uh,
could you just start off stating the name of your community interest company
and what you provide to the community?
Alright.
Um,
the company is called Ujima Raiders's pronounced Ujima,
although it's spelled U J I M A.
Ujima CIC
started 17 years ago,
and they have a licence which I think is is specific
because Ujima
provides a service
that
reached out to communities that were often described as in and out to reach,
so the licence was unique in that way.
And the mission was to provide a platform
for African Caribbean people
to get into media and to be able to move on
to other media streams.
In 2022,
the mission
was revised,
so now the mission is slightly different.
So we're using language that we never did before.
So now we talk about.
Um,
empowerment,
entertainment,
education,
and informing
people about African heritage communities
which can be many different communities,
primarily but not exclusively
so that's what we're doing we're saying to people this community exists.
And as
Ujima Radio,
we want to make sure
that the whole world can connect to this community
and we will tell you what people are doing,
how to get to them,
and all of that.
So that's what Ujima CIC is.
Oh,
that's fantastic.
So you applied for the Community resilience fund.
Yes,
you were successful
in being allocated a portion of funding.
Yes.
So
can you just tell me what you've spent that funding on?
Alright,
the funding we have was
sort of different to most of the funding
that people receive for what they do because it's called capital funding.
We don't have a building,
so our funding
was primarily
to
sort of re renovate the studio
so it was to purchase equipment
to bring us up to speed with,
you know,
modern technology.
So we had a grant specifically to do that,
to carry out refurbishment of a Jima radio
at the station.
Excellent.
And what difference has this funding made to the staff here
and to the wider community that you serve?
Well,
in media,
you might know because you're a media person yourself.
If you want to do media,
you have to be up with the times.
Now the studios we have,
they
have been there for a while.
If we are going to be able to compete,
train people to bring them up to speed with what's happening now,
it was necessary
to have the right things in.
So now what we've done,
we said to CRF,
we want some money to purchase the following things,
and that's what they said.
Uh,
we want to have new studio.
We want to have new,
you know,
desktops.
We want to have everything.
So that's what they're funded us to do,
to purchase
up to-date equipment so that we're able to compete,
so that we're to expand,
because later on I'm sure you'll ask me something that will,
I'll tell you where we're trying to go.
As a station,
OK,
so it's
our money is really
slightly different from other fund funding
that I know people have had
because theirs is more towards
refurb fixing buildings or that we're not,
we're not that we're about equipment specific.
So how did you
find out about the application
and how did you?
Find
filling out the the application form.
All right,
if I,
if I tell you the honest story,
the
Ujima started a new board of directors came into play in August of 2022
when we came on board.
The funding had already been applied for,
so the previous board applied for the funding
when we came on board,
and it's a new,
entirely new board,
we then took over.
So we came and saw that funding.
So we restarted that conversation with CRF to say we're now the new board.
We,
we want to acknowledge the fact that you have,
you know,
funded this
and we want to continue to do this.
So that's what we did.
So
in fairness to the people who did it before
they did the application,
I,
I looked at it.
It looked like the kind of application that was,
you know,
well put together,
I think.
The IRF was impressed with it
and therefore they funded it.
There was a slight delay
and there still is,
but I'll come to that later.
So
it was a good idea for whoever
put in the application form.
Yes,
it was a good idea for them to put it in.
You're happy that they put in for the CRF,
CRF in a sense,
because we get Bristol Impact Fund as well.
It's coming from the same part,
so it.
The funding that we get
is used primarily to employ the people we have.
So I think CRF felt,
well,
if Ujima's people working in this,
this and that,
it's only reasonable that we support them to be able to do that work
because they need this,
this and that.
So I think the two came together
so we had
different pots,
but it's coming from the same source.
So I think they were impressed with the fact that we're a broadcaster
and therefore they.
We're happy to assist
with making sure we're able to broadcast
competitively.
Excellent.
You did
touch on it a moment ago.
What has impacted the delivery of your project?
So from filling out the forms,
receiving the funding and then delivering the upgrades or changes that you
feel
are important.
The impact for me is,
is,
and I come back because I,
I hinted that.
The impact is that I think CRF has been very patient and tolerant with us in this way
we still haven't finished that work
right,
and we have had to
on occasions go back to them to say there has been delays and there has been
because you know we start or this is what we want to get,
then there's a whole process of getting that.
In our case,
the funding is for the equipment,
and there's a small bit of it
for revenue to get somebody to do some of the work.
That's the bit we struggle with a lot.
So we
Ujima relies a lot on volunteering.
So most of the people here,
70 people we have as presenters who are volunteers.
Fortunately we have had the support of
people who assist us with tech.
So to move over to what we want to become,
we have to rely on that.
So there has been delays in terms of compliance and
what we can do internally and what we can't do.
So we have now
reached the stage where we're looking to complete
by the end of July.
So we have started.
So if you go into what we call the brain
of the,
of,
of the station,
all the things that needed to be replaced and refurbished are in place now.
Excellent.
So the,
the last bit of work now is to convert
the two studios
to upgrade that,
and I'm looking at this form which says we need to complete.
This
end of grand form
by the end of March 2026.
So that's
ultimately,
what we need to complete the project itself
by the end of July.
So that's still our aim
to complete that.
Um,
so,
have they been
mostly the main setbacks and issues?
The main setbacks has been compliance issues in terms of,
you know,
for example,
we know of a lease
which was,
we had a licence before.
A lease is a bit more powerful,
so we have to comply with the laws around.
How you can turn this and put that there and what was you can drill
and some proofing all of that has to be approved
by our landlords.
So
the other thing is we,
we put a list together of the equipment we needed at the time,
bearing in mind we have only the 2 years.
You will know in,
in your industry these things change.
So last year you're talking about,
I don't know,
a Windows 11.
This year you might be talking about.
Um,
what do you call this?
AI.
Oh,
AI,
yeah,
yeah.
All that is coming now.
So the tech.
Yes.
And now it's.
The technical team has to be working.
Yeah.
To make sure that whatever happens when we finish,
we're able to compete
just the same.
Um.
So,
let's say we are,
This phone
at the time when we put together the bid
we would want to say an Android 5.4.
We then realise by next year the company that we
asked for it says we don't have that anymore.
We have moved up.
You need to move up with the times,
so negotiating to keep the price the same.
Was a bit we had to do all of that so we have to revisit the whole bit
and say right this is what things cost at the
time we applied all the time when the application was made
is that still the case?
Are we able to negotiate and we had to do that
so that's,
that's something we learned and you know with
technology in your industry things change every day.
Every day something new comes on board
and if we are going to be competitive we have to make sure we stay on board.
Yeah,
it's great getting the funding,
but then you need the technical expertise as well to go with that,
yes.
So
you have been successful in getting the community resilience fund,
which is great.
Have your future plans changed since receiving,
This graph,
yes,
we are
a broadcaster,
so we broadcast.
What we want to become is a media house,
which is just,
it's just more than broadcasting,
so we're talking about Ujma TV.
We're talking about social media we're talking about
utilising
all the new media stuff that's that's around now.
So we started out looking to get equipment to continue to broadcast,
but at the same time we want to balance
that with being able to become not just a broadcaster
but a media house.
That's what we want to go.
So that's the plan and we think
the the resilience fund certainly has enabled that.
Because
we're able to purchase,
as I say,
equipment
that will move us from not just being a broadcaster
but actually being a media house.
So that's,
that's
grand,
um,
expectations historically,
yes,
and,
uh,
you have been successful
with the community resilience fund,
right.
But if you hadn't received this grant,
where would your
organisation be?
What would you have done if you hadn't been successful?
We would have had to find ways to still do what we had
aimed to do,
but like I aimed before,
I think
the word resilience is a very
powerful word.
I think the fondness,
um,
identified.
Uh,
we fit into that terminology quite well,
resilience.
I also believe it was an innovative,
um,
funding.
I think CRF
benefited from supporting
a station like Ujima,
so
it's a bit of both.
Because they're seeing that we're doing something which is going to make a
a complete difference to people and to communities and
to the world because remember we're a world broadcaster
so I think if you're a funder and you're able to say
we were part of ensuring this happens,
it works both ways.
So yes,
the big answer to the question is without that funding
we would probably not have been able
to move as swiftly
as we were able to,
um,
with without it.
And not just the funding that they gave,
the support that they gave was also very useful.
So you got good support and the tolerance level,
because,
you know,
you get funding,
you know,
it works.
You get funding,
you have time to spend the job.
We were able to negotiate time changes and setbacks and all of that,
and I think they were quite
tolerant.
They're very understanding,
yes,
yes.
Um,
so let's dream a little bit.
If money was absolutely no object,
what would your priority be for the future
of Fujima
going forward?
Our priority would be,
as I say,
to become one of these
media houses
that is special.
We're special in that.
licence
gives us,
I think,
um,
the power to do things that
ordinary licences don't do.
We believe the big
positive about Ojima is the difference it makes in the context of its mission,
because if it's about the three E's and the I which I described earlier,
empowerment,
entertain,
educate and inform,
if you have a media house that does that.
Right
in the way we are doing it,
then we will make a significant difference.
So let me give an example.
Earlier I talked about in terminology.
People talk about Afro-Caribbean,
Somalia,
this,
that we're trying to change your in language
so we talk about African heritage people.
Whether you're born in Jamaica,
Cuba,
it doesn't matter
as long as your descendants are Africans
that's what we're saying
we talk about
we're not a black radio station that's the terminal you used before.
We're,
we're a station
that tries to
highlight the contribution from African heritage people,
right?
It doesn't mean
you work only with African heritage people.
We're only about that,
that's not the case,
right?
So that's what we think
if money wasn't an object we'd be able to do,
enable people to understand
how,
you know,
we have done as a,
as a people the things that we have done,
not just in Bristol because we're not a Bristol station,
we're a world station based in Bristol,
so that's what we believe we'll be able to do.
Um,
you've
applied for funding
in the past.
So was there anything different
or unique about the resilience fund application or the process
compared
with
the other funding that you might have applied for or been successful in getting?
Well,
I ended that before,
I think if you,
if you're calling yourself the resilience fund,
you have to determine whether or not you're funding something that's resilient.
As a people,
you will know.
That we have been a resilient people for centuries.
There's no two ways about that one.
So if I was a funder,
I would want to be part of saying
we were very instrumental in enabling
this resilience to continue.
So I think we fit the category perfectly,
especially where it applies to being resilient.
Because you have to be resilient
in whatever you do
to be convicted to it,
to believe in it,
and to be clear that you are making a difference,
you are impacting,
you know,
and as I said,
we reach people that are
sometimes described as in and out to reach.
We can reach them.
That's what we're about.
So we,
uh.
The moment
we are accommodating
people to be able to be accountable as well,
right?
So the show I do,
for example,
I bring people that show who are
saying this is what we do
we are finding it difficult to find people.
Well,
we'll find them for you.
You just need to come and tell people
what you do,
um,
so that's what we do.
So I think the resilience is a key word for me there
if you're a resilience fund.
Then I would want to feel that when you give money
you're making sure that your name
is embedded in why you give money
so that was important
excellent
lastly.
How do you feel about the Community Resilience Fund?
You mentioned that
they were very understanding,
they've moved dates,
etc.
So has it met your expectations and would you apply again if the opportunity arose?
I thought you were going to say you need to apply again.
Oh
yes,
most definitely we would definitely
apply again
for funding from
CRF.
We have had funding as well.
We have had different funding.
I'm sure there's a project we're doing now
that's funded by CRF,
very sure.
I think it's a partnership with BCFM radio
to
to look at some things,
and that funding came from CRF.
So I think the Community resilience fund.
Are very impressed with the work we do.
Has it met your expectations?
Yes,
yes,
it has.
I think
in funding terms,
I have found it very easy.
So I'm looking at like the form you send back at the end.
It's a very simple form.
This is what you ask for.
Tell us how you spend the money
and we're happy with that.
So it's not one of these complicated big bits.
It's not like that.
It's a very simplified,
Process
and like I say I am in a position where when we
started as a new board because we started a new board,
we have to learn very quickly
because there was no satellite handing over we had to learn
on our feet
and the assistance and the support we have had from people in that
in that team
has been perfect excellent.
We have had
you know deadlines late and all of that,
but they were quite supportive and understanding.
I think we have also brought to the table.
Some things that they weren't sort of aware of.
So like if you're doing data,
for example,
you produce a form and it says we want the following data.
We have had to be saying to foreigners,
well,
you have to be very mindful of how you use language.
So for us,
if you say African and then put Somalia,
you're dividing,
you're taking Africans out of Africa.
Somalians are African,
so.
You,
you can't put African then put Somalian.
That's,
that's,
so we have been instrumental in changing the narrative
in terms of people understanding difference between ancestry,
nationality,
where you were born.
So we use simplify things.
What's your descendants,
Africans,
where were you born?
Born in Jamaica.
What's your current nationality?
British.
We have had to be changing language.
I know people look at.
You,
you know,
so they just,
so when you see black,
which you will see on some farms,
you see a whole long list of different things
that I think keeps us
in a sense separated.
Jima's purpose and mission is to try and enable
and encourage people who wouldn't otherwise understand all that,
but that's what we're about.
And you felt CRF were conducive to that listening,
understanding,
because part of what I think will happen going forward,
we have offered.
Um,
fondness,
the opportunity
to talk about that
in terms of when they do stats they have to understand the difference with Laujin
because we're not like most of them because of what we are about,
uh,
and so I think they will learn from us as well
because we have the experience and the expertise
to be able to support fondness
to understand why we are different.
So when you fund difference,
I think that's a powerful thing.
So you're not funding the same thing,
and that's why I keep using the word
resilience,
you know,
if you identify
that you're funding something
that ultimately would benefit the world,
which is what we think Ujima will do,
then that can't be a bad thing.
So even though you get the funding,
you're also making sure you give.
The other thing that they were impressed with,
and I think most people funds are.
We have been able to maintain a pool of volunteers
for a long time.
Remember,
most of our presenters are volunteers.
You will know from your experience it's not very easy
to keep volunteers in anything.
People love what they do.
People come on here.
They're broadcasting.
People listen to them.
So you feel that you're doing something for
your community and for your own development.
We have moved people on from you have gone on to other media
stations and all that.
So we think it's,
it's effective in that way.
Funders benefit from that too,
because when they do their statistics,
it shows
that they are making a difference with the funding they provide
because who they fund
is making a difference.
So in the same way we will say,
and I'm saying this,
you know,
we don't know apology,
the CRF grant we had was very
useful,
still will be.
I'm sure we'll come back,
but we are also,
as people receive funding,
we believe we benefit funders
when they are able to see that their money
is making a difference.
It's excellent.
Um,
thank you so much
for speaking to me.
Is there anything else you would like to mention?
Uh,
well,
I didn't say I,
I am currently part of the we have a unique board now because we have a,
a,
a,
a new board
of people who are sort of singing from the same hymn sheet
and we are very convicted
to our mission,
um,
so our priority now is to
sort of move us into the thirty-third century
because,
you know,
with media everything is moving very quickly.
So we think there are no opportunities
for us to become trendsetters,
to become leaders,
to become,
you know,
so we do have FM licence and a DAV licence
which makes us quite big.
We have
quite good useful partners.
Um,
the CX and investment team is one of them,
because,
as I said,
we have had quite
a lot of support from
the,
the grants team in the city council,
uh,
including CRRF.
So I think,
um,
yes,
I would be the first to say.
As I said,
I think funders
who support initiatives like this
have to be respected and regarded and be said
that yes,
we feel that you know we have had quite
a good
support
from
the CRF.
That's
brilliant.
Thank you so much.
Right.
I
Up-big